HOME

 
 
 



 






.. HOME


LINKS YOU MAY NEED

 Every Senator's E-Mail

 Contact My Politician

 Help Keep Voter Rolls Accurate

 Trump Endorsement Tracker

 Primary Elections By State

 Bonds For The Win

 School Boards And Bonds
 
Federal Mission Resilence

 Global Incidents Maps

 Human Trafficking Arrests

. Capitol Breach Cases

. HTR Supreme Court Decision

. Supreme Court Gov

. SCOTUS - Election Cases

. FOA Requests

. 25th Amendment

. Sovereign Immunity
 
 
  Printable Vax Exemption 

. Employee Exemption
 
. Employee Exemption 2
 
. Student Exemption
 
. Nuremberg
 
. Religious Exemption

. Ivermectin
.
. Ivermectin 2



Patient Advocate Forms

. Patient Form 1
.
. Patient Form 2
.
. Patient Form 3
.
. Patient Form 4
.
. Patient Form 5
Important Links
 
 Easy Vaccine Reporting

. DHHS Estate Recovery

 . Critical Race In Your State?

. Federal Criminal Database

. Stop Google Tracking You

. Executive Orders

 


Buy From Patriots, Not Amazon


PSA - Drop AT&T - Same Rates!











































































































































































 



































































































































































Besucherzähler einbinden











The Brunson Complaint On The Supreme Court Docket Jan 6th 2023

Website - LINK



Due To Be Heard On Jan 6th
So I Make Up A Page On Sovereign Immunity And Brunson Gets His Case To The Supreme Court.  That Is GREAT News. I've Read This And The Appeals. I Could Tell They Wanted To Lose So They Could Appeal Quickly. The Two State Attorney's Who Were Successful On Getting This Case Dismissed Before, Have Been Removed. They Have Been Replaced By The Solicitor General. Interestingly, She Did Not Object To This Case Moving Ahead To SCOTUS.

So This Is ALL About Immunity. Yes The 388 People Being Removed Would Be A Plus, But It's Not The Bigger Picture. It's What They Use To Get ALL Lawsuits Brought Against Them, Thrown Out. The Court Now Has To Look At The Immunity They Claim, And The Constitution That Truly Spells It Out. They All Have Taken Advantage Of This Law And Used It To Stay In Power And Do What They Want. Both Democrats And Republicans. It Isn't About Party Anymore, It's About Corrupt Politicians.   

Side Note: Rattletrap Is Saying Military Takes Precedent Over Supreme Court Decision. Once Again, This Has Nothing To Do With A Military Decision. This Is About Sovereign Immunity. Both Can Happen.



Challenging The Immunity Of Congress
This Supreme Court Decision Will Affect
ALL Immunity Claims, Including Media.


Pence & Pelosi Certify The Illegal 2020 Election
This Suit Hinges On This Video Evidence That The Election Was Not Allowed To Be Questioned.
They Used Covid And The Fact That No Debates Were Allowed. It Wasn't A Debate. It Was A Question.
 Ever Wonder Why There Seems To Be All Sorts Of "Hearings" But No One Is Ever Held
 Accountable? MTG And The Republicans Tell Us They Can Now Make Committees To "Go After
 People" For Jan 6th And Other Wrongs, But You Should Know, They Cannot Go After Anyone
 Who Is A Politician. Nancy Pelosi Used Sovereign Immunity For Her Role In The Jan 6th Issues
 That She Helped Create. No One Can Bring Charges Against Her For Refusing The Guards That
 Day. And MSM Sure Isn't Going To Tell You She Is Using Sovereign Immunity To Keep Her Story
 Quiet. The Fake Committee Went After Bannon, Who Is Not A Politician. They Went After
 Trump's Family As Well. Trump Was Subpoenaed.  He Didn't Bother With It. He Also Enjoys
 The Same Privilege.

 If MTG Holds Her Hearings, Don't Expect Much From Witnesses Who Hold Office. If They Do
 Show Up, They Will Probably Take The 5th. However, Some Of The People I Expect To Be
 Subpoenaed Could Be Ray Epps, DC Police, News Reporters, Ashley's Killer, Michael Leroy
 Bird, And John Sullivan To Name A Few. Of Course Fake News Probably Won't Broadcast These
 Hearings.   




Lets Take A Look At ALL The Immunity's People Enjoy. There Is Long A List.

 LAW

 Legal Immunity - the concept of a person or entity being immune from legal
 liability due to special status

. Absolute Immunity - a type of immunity for government officials that confers total
  immunity when acting in the course of their duties.
. Amnesty Law - a law that provides amnesty for past crimes
. Charitable Immunity - immunity from liability granted to charities in many
  countries from the 19th century to the mid 20th century.
. Diplomatic Immunity - agreement between of sovereign governments to exclude diplomats 
  from local laws
. Immunity From Prosecution (International Law) - exclusion of governments or their offices from
  prosecution under international law
. Judicial Immunity - immunity of a judge or magistrate in the course of their official duties
. Parliamentary Immunity - immunity granted to elected officials during their tenure and in the
  course of their duties
. Qualified Immunity - in the United States, immunity of individuals performing tasks as part of
  the government's actions
. Sovereign Immunity - the prevention of lawsuits or prosecution against rulers of governments
  without their given consent
. Sovereign Immunity In The United States - the legal privilege by which the American federal,
  state, and tribal governments cannot be sued
. Spousal Immunity - also called spousal immunity, protects a spouse from testifying against
  the defendant
. State Immunity - principle of international law that the government of a state is not amenable
  before the courts of another state
. Witness Immunity - immunity granted to a witness in exchange for testimony



 That Charitable Immunity Needs A Closer Look. The Clinton Foundation And All The
 Non Profits They Use To Launder Money Comes To Mind. But For Now, Let Start By Looking
 At The Two Immunity's That Seems To Be Protecting The Swamp

Absolute Immunity - a type of immunity for government officials that confers total immunity when acting in the course of their duties.

Qualified Immunity - in the United States, immunity of individuals performing tasks as part of
  the government's actions


Absolute And Qualified Immunity

The Eleventh Amendment Explained



In The United States law, state, federal and tribal governments generally enjoy immunity from lawsuits. Local governments typically enjoy immunity from some forms of suit, particularly in tort
In the US, sovereign immunity falls into two categories
Absolute Immunity - pursuant to which a government actor may not be sued for the allegedly wrongful act, even if that person acted maliciously or in bad faith. and:

Qualified Immunity -  pursuant to which a government actor is shielded from liability only in specific conditions are met, as specified in statute or case law.
In some situations, sovereign immunity may have been waived by law.


Federal Sovereign Immunity

The federal government of the United States has sovereign immunity and may not be sued anywhere in the United States unless it has waived its immunity or consented to suit. The United States has waived sovereign immunity to a limited extent, mainly through the Federal Tort Claims Act, which waives the immunity if a tortious act of a federal employee causes damage, and the Tucker Act, which waives the immunity over claims arising out of contracts to which the federal government is a party.The United States as a sovereign is immune from suit unless it unequivocally consents to being sued.The United States Supreme Court in Price v. United States observed: "It is an axiom of our jurisprudence. The government is not liable to suit unless it consents thereto, and its liability in suit cannot be extended beyond the plain language of the statute authorizing it." Price v. United States, 174 U.S. 373, 375-76 (1899) .nteresting That This Was The Only Video I Could Find On This Subject.

State Sovereign Immunity


Hans v. Louisiana (1890), the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Eleventh Amendment (1795) re-affirms that states possess sovereign immunity and are therefore generally immune from being sued in federal court without their consent. In later cases, the Supreme Court has strengthened state sovereign immunity considerably. In Blatchford v. Native Village of Noatak (1991), the court explained that:

we have understood the Eleventh Amendment to stand not so much for what it says, but for the presupposition of our constitutional structure which it confirms: that the States entered the federal system with their sovereignty intact; that the judicial authority in Article III is limited by this sovereignty, and that a State will therefore not be subject to suit in federal court unless it has consented to suit, either expressly or in the "plan of the convention". [Citations omitted.]

Additionally, Congress can abrogate state sovereign immunity when it acts pursuant to powers delegated to it by any amendments ratified after the Eleventh Amendment. The abrogation doctrine, established by the Supreme Court in Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer (1976), is most often implicated in cases that involve Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment, which explicitly allows Congress to enforce its guarantees on the states.

Legal Dictionary - Sovereign Immunity - LINK
 

What Is Qualified Immunity? 




Qualified Immunity, Should Lawmakers Make Changes?




Charitable Immunity
How Foundations Get Away With Hiding The Money?







Charitable Immunity
Even In Cases Of Child Molestation?




Diplomatic Immunity







  Presidential Immunity
Although the U.S. president is sued daily in his governmental capacity, he normally is not sued in his personal capacity as being personally liable. In 1982, the Supreme Court held in Nixon v. Fitzgerald that the president enjoys absolute immunity from civil litigation for official acts undertaken while he or she is president. The Court suggested that this immunity was broad (though not limitless), applying to acts within the "outer perimeter" of the president's official duties.Fifteen years after Fitzgerald, the Supreme Court held in Clinton v. Jones that the president does not possess absolute immunity from civil litigation surrounding acts he carried out that were not part of his official duties (which is often incorrectly presented as referring only to acts carried out before becoming president). The 2020 Supreme Court decision in Trump v. Vance held that the president is subject to subpoenas in criminal prosecutions for personal conduct with the same legal threshold as anyone else.




  Immunity From Prosecution







Can I Be Forced To Testify Agonist My Spouse?






Church Immunity Against Sexual Abuse Crimes?





Crimes Against Humanity




  Sexual Offences Against Children - Criminal Law



Copyright 2021  -  www.oldportportland.com